![]() That being said, I love KBM – and even if it does “interrupt” my work, I know that it is saving me tons of time, doing like 10x the stuff in the short “interruption” than I ever could. ![]() having KBM execute its macros in some virtual desktop environment, that does run on my computer’s CPU and uses its applications and files, but that does not interfere with the desktop and the keyboard and mouse that I am using as the user? Is there any way of doing this virtually? I.e. Some time ago, I actually used an old iMac I had just for executing KBM macros, while I was working on my own Mac. So it’s either me using the Mac, or KBM using the Mac – but never both of us at the same time. I can’t have other applications in the foreground, and if I even were to move my mouse or do something on the keyboard, then I’d by interfering with KBM, and KBM would be interfering with me. Right now, while that macro is running, I can’t use my Mac. I’ve got a macro that opens a browser window, goes to a URL, clicks some buttons there, copies text to the clipboard, closes the window, etc… ![]() on some virtual screen perhaps, while I, as the human, can still use my Mac without interfering with the macro execution? ![]() Is there, or will there ever be, a way of having KBM execute macros “in the background”, i.e. I think this isn’t possible right now, and perhaps will never be possible due to the nature of KBM. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |